Proposal from the Santa Fe Mafia

This post is the same as the one I sent out by email. Since then, Wendy Watson and Tom Keens have agreed to join the steering committee. I am presently recruiting a couple of people from the class of '69 to join it as well, so that planning can actually involve people from both of the first two classes. There has been some concern about the dates, and I am suggesting that we do not make commitments until sometime between the middle and end of September.

Phil

Dear Classmates --

At Sam's request, I am sending out to all a radical alternative to what has been discussed so far. It has the backing of Jim Liljenwall, Joey Townsend, Lynn Archer, Harold Morgan, Claudia Larcombe, Jim Walker, and me. There are no doubt others who will sign on. First, the major points of the proposal; next some possible activities falling under the terms of the proposal; third, some reasons for the proposal and against the standard alternative; and finally Sam’s message to all.

Outline of The Proposal

(1) Declare independence from the College's plans for our homecoming.

(2) Plan instead our own series of homecoming events at venues other than the SJC campus.

(3) Pick the date most convenient for the majority of members of the first two classes.

(4) Empower our classmates living in Santa Fe to make the arrangements.

(5) Choose one of us to be liaison to the college and invite college participation on our terms.

(6) Declare The Odyssey our text of return.

(7) Acknowledge the need for timely decisions and deadlines. Accordingly, recognize a steering committee in short order. Let’s accept July 4th as our date for the onset of our campaign; volunteers for the steering committee need to make themselves known before that date. The steering committee has to be built around our Santa Fe residents, Sam and Jim and Lynn. As someone needs to take the lead here, I suggest that to those three we add Joey and Harold. I am willing to serve as secretary (email conduit) for the committee. Pending the volunteering of others for the steering committee, I urge that we accept Sam as the de facto chairman of the committee. Let the organizing begin.

Possible Activities Under the Proposal (of course there are others)

1) Conversation groups on topics of interest to us, led by class members or others of our choosing. (For example: discussion of the origin of life, led by one or two members of the SF Institute; discussion on the ethics of medical practice, led by Tom Keens; discussion of the Constitution and the Amendments, led by Sam Larcombe and Jim Walker; discussion of the last Harry Potter book, led by Wendy Watson.)

2) Explorations of New Mexico. (These could include field trips led by Sam Larcombe and Rick Flint.)

3) Festschrift in honor of our experience. (This project is already underway and can come to fruition whether we are in sync with the college or not.)

4) Reflection on our lives in a meditative setting (a la a Quaker meeting).

5) Screening of a movie and conversation afterward. (We could rent one of the local theaters for a special showing of, e.g., "The Dead" or "Ulysses" or...)

6) Attending SF Opera and Chamber Music Festival. (Obviously, independent of the college's plans.)

7) Engaging a videographer to record all or some of our events.

Rationale

Do we really SJC tutors, who may be half our age (and who serve only for pay), to lead us in discussions? Are we not quite capable of conducting our own? Is it beyond the realm of possibility that any of us is capable of asking an opening question and gently serving as seminar leader? (Some of us do this professionally or semi-professionally.)

Is the point of our homecoming to see the college and its new buildings, or is it to see one another, to explore our memories, to unburden ourselves of long pent-up emotions, to share our life experiences, our joys, and sorrows?

Should the date of the homecoming be convenient for the majority of our two classes or should it be determined by the convenience of the college?

If some of us have an interest in seeing the college and engaging in activities on campus, there is nothing to prevent their doing so. One of us could serve as liaison, perhaps someone who is currently involved with college activities or someone who is particularly keen to maintain cordial relations.

How does this proposal square with the survey effort? The survey should go forward: its results will be our gift to the college.

Are we leaving other classes in the lurch? That is, what about the classes of 1973, 1978, 1983, 1988, 1993, 1998, 2003? Maybe it's time to think about the meaning of reunion and homecoming. Or maybe we are suffering from a lack of appropriate vocabulary. Truthfully, what do we have in common with the class of 2003? Perhaps one or two tutors? The program itself, of course, but what else? The campus or Santa Fe itself? Both have changed enormously. What distinguishes our coming together (the coming together of the classes of '68 and '69) from a college-sponsored homecoming of all the classes listed above is that our being together as companions is in no way artificial: it does not depend upon the accident of choosing five-year intervals. If the college chooses to hold its homecoming at the same time as ours, then those of us who so wish can certainly participate in college-sponsored activities, such as an all-college seminar (a sock-hop in the new gym? a hot dog feast by the pool?). It is certainly possible that, if the college's homecoming and our reunion coincide, representatives of our class can plan joint activities with representatives of other classes and college officials.

As I have written elsewhere, and more than once, time is not on our side. We have to do our planning and organizing soon – the earlier the better. I have argued that the survey should go out immediately after the alumni association meeting in late July. Who knows what the results will be? Whatever they are, we will live with them. It is certainly conceivable (if highly unlikely) that a majority of SF alumni will prefer a non-summer homecoming. If so, let the college arrange a homecoming for all those classes listed, and any of us so inclined and having the time can attend that event as well. We'll do nothing to undermine it.

The fact remains, though, that this 40th anniversary of our graduation is something of a watershed. Most of us are still alive and relatively healthy, but consider the situation of our 50th anniversary, 10 years down the road. How many of us will still be more or less as we are now? Will we be able to arrange our own events when we are all in our seventies? In a sense, we are at the height of our powers now: we can reflect with full vigor, we can share before it's too late. I, for one, have never had a desire to attend my high school reunions. I am sure I am not alone in affirming that it was our experience at the college and with each other that marked us, changed us, for life – and for living. To what or whom is our debt greatest? Perhaps to Scott Buchanan and Stringfellow Barr; perhaps to our tutors (Brown, Wilson, Darkey, Slakey, Swentzell, Davis, Ossorgin, Bunker, Bell, Kramer, et al.); perhaps to Dr. Weigle; perhaps to one another; perhaps to the courage awakened within each of us to see it through to the end; perhaps to an idea that conversation, among friends, about books and music worth knowing and loving, is the truly human calling. To all these we raise a toast in celebration; it is something we can do only by and for ourselves.

Phil Chandler


Sam’s Message to All:

We decide within two weeks to take over the whole affair. We shall conceive, plan, and execute everything without the college's interference.

Within four weeks, we choose the actual dates of the gathering.

Claudia (Kit) and I will accept appointment as the "logistics grunts" (if so picked in a timely fashion), but only if we get clear, concise tasks and direction. We shall convene a local group of willing classmates (SF 68/69).

All who come in 2008 agree to contribute a tangible "piece" of any sort, whether written or visual, capable of reproduction, personal, intellectual, literary.

All who come agree to offer (either solo or with one or more others) an activity: tutorial; demonstration; performance; discussion; outing; blessing; slide show; civic event.... Of necessity and for elegance, these ought to be "time-limited."

We assent that the whole occasion will be a time of good humor, intimate, and most un-official: twenty laughs to each tear. The motto: Warm and leisurely together.

We agree that a reasonable budget be drawn up by a steering committee, and that reasonable fees be imposed. We shall, I think, want to underwrite publications, meeting place costs, food and drink, and materials essential to activities. Of course, the oily devils of the steering committee must be charged with seducing any of us with real substance into underwriting various costs. (EG: the "Austin W. Pringle Greek Leap and Salad Deconstruction Reflection.")

We agree that by August 31, 2007, we have all fundaments of the event underway.

From my years as a public slave, I know that decisions must be made early and that deadlines must be set. Essentially, cantankerous as we may be, we are herd critters. Let the decisions be made and the herd will gather.

Formally, Claudia and I say to say to the others that we want nothing to do with any institutionally sanctioned and sponsored event. As you know (and may publish), we left the college behind us years ago. It is our classmates we love and want to see.

I am pushing these thoughts forward because I am willing to spent considerable time over the next year helping to make a good gathering happen.

Sam

Planning For a Survey

As some of you may already know. St. Johns recently changed the date for homecoming from Summer to Fall. This has taken quite a few people by surprise and there seems to be a widespread sentiment that this is sub-optimal.

A group of alumni, a number of whom are from the 1968 class, want to know whether Santa Fe alumni in general favor the new time or the traditional time. To help determine when the most alumni are likely to show up for a homecoming we are going to send a survey out to all matriculated Santa Fe alumni who have registered on the St. Johns alumni site (http://www.stjohnscollege.edu/asp/main.aspx?page=1010).

If you would like to be on a mailing list which track discussions of this survey with alumni and St. Johns administrators and Alumni Association officers, please email David Mischel, SF'68 (david@mischels.net).

If you would like to be directly involved in drafting the survey itself, the questions to ask and analyze the data collected, please email Carl Bostek, SF'68 (sv.aphrodite@gmail.com).

Summaries of this project will be posted from time to time to this site and also to a Yahoo Groups site which has been created for Santa Fe alumni (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/santafe-alumni/).

Festschrift, Santa Fe Class of 1968

Dear Classmates --

Over the past two days, I have had two good, long conversations with Sam and Claudia Larcombe. I am very happy to report that Sam wants to be part of the homecoming celebrations, and both have agreed even to set foot on campus, something they have not, on principle, done for many years. Sam is working on a kind of memorial piece in honor and recollection of Ken and will be circulating it soon. He and Claudia also plan to enter the email lists in the near future.

In the course of conversation, it occurred to us that Sam's piece on Ken could well be folded into a more significant document. What I have in mind is a Festschrift, a collection of essays, poetry, recollections in honor, not only of Ken, but of Hal Papps, Gary Thornton, and any others who have died, and also of our tutors, Ford Brown, Bill Darkey, Tom Slakey, Bob Bunker, Charles Bell, and others. I'm sure that, over the years, all of us have done some writing. So the idea is not necessarily to contribute something specifically about Ken or Hal or FKB, etc.; rather, it is for each of us to contribute something of value, the very value itself being a way of showing respect and love for those in whose honor the Festschrift would be put together and published. Contributions could range from a scientific paper you, Tom, have already published (with permission from the former publisher, of course!), to a poem written specifically for the occasion. In short,the contributions can be whatever anyone wants to contribute.

Sam, at my insistence, has agreed to edit the volume, and I have offered to help him. If we start sending things to Sam now, we should be able to have all contributions in hand in plenty of time to get a small publishing run off the press in time for our homecoming, whether it is in summer of fall of 2008. Accordingly, I am proposing that all of us send hard copies of our contributions to Sam (not email versions, as he is not now using email and, besides, it would not be fair for him to have to print out all of our stuff). Let's see what we can collect over the next couple of months.

Here is Sam's address: 4313 Sleeping Bear Lane; Santa Fe, NM 87507.
Here is Sam and Claudia's phone number: 505.983.5336. I am sure they would like to hear from any of us.

I trust that the idea of a Festschrift will meet with approval of all of you.

Warm regards,

Phil

Santa Fe 1968 Gallery

A slight correction: While I did send these photos in to the group, they were actually scanned from a document put out by the College in the Spring of 1968 called First Commencement. It featured pictures (shown) and a short blurb on each of the 35 of us still at St John's College in Santa Fe in the Class of 19689 at the time.
---Tom Keens

Did Buzz Gray start with class of '68?

I have a vague recollection that Ernest Amlin "Buzz" Gray started with the class of '68 before he went as a C/O medic to Vietnam. (I met him when he came back and can't remember the details now.) He is living in the NY area and teaching drama and play-writing at Sarah Lawrence.

Amlin is a good example of a 'missing person' who may or may not have started with our class but who it would be great to invite to a homecoming in 2008, whatever month!!

RE: how to manage the list?

Hi Vida!

Thank you for your always sensible comments -- especially the news about your local college!

Regarding the name, I think David chose a broader name for the blog since many have expressed interest in including those in the classes immediately following ours (with whom we shared the campus), and I imagine Carl followed suit with the Yahoo group.

Leslie reported recently that Jill Rosenbloom is listed on E. 6th St. in the NYC telephone book.

There's no one listed in the 2001 Alumni Directory named Mike Shaffer or Shafer -- could you mean Michael Kalisher? That's the only Michael with a similar sounding name I have found in the class of '68. But I haven't found any contact info, sorry.

Rick

________________________________________
From: Vida Kazemi
Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2007 22:42
For someone who knows nothing about computers, a yahoo list seems
simple enough. However, I am provincial and only interested in people
with whom I have had some contact. Wouldn't class of 68 be more
appropriate? After all, the class was different enough to have an
article written about its graduates at the time.
But thanks to all of you who are helping with our communication. May
be we can make the process of reunion "unnecessary".
By the way, our local college, Harvard, has its reunions in June and
doesn't seem to suffer for it.
Does anyone know what happened to Jill Rosenbloom or Mike Shaffer? (I
may have misspelled)

Yahoo Group for SF Alumni

Okay.....here's a way to manage the e-mail issue effectively: I've created a group on Yahoo called "St. John's College Santa Fe Alumni" It is an open, unmoderated group. You can choose to receive e-mails immediately, as a daily digest, or just view them on the web.

I haven't presumed to add anyone to the list. If you think this is a good solution, join the group. Only members will get e-mails from it. I don't like to be overwhelmed by individual e-mails, so I select the daily digest from the groups I have joined. But if you live on-line and want to stay current, you can receive e-mails immediately as they're posted.

Cheers,

Carl

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/santafe-alumni/

Jon Fritz died; and how to manage the list?

First, I just got authoritative word that Jon Fritz died a couple years ago at his family home in Alaska. R.I.P.

From: Carl Bostek [sv.aphrodite@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 23:28
The e-mail "list" has become too cumbersome since it's not a managed list -- not everybody gets every e-mail.

Hi Carl,

No, you're right. (And this is an example. You only wrote to me, and I started out responding to you, but decided to copy the group in hopes of getting wider input. Hope you don't mind.)

As it is now, each person who emails either decides for themselves who they want to send to or copy, or (if they hit Respond to All) simply sends to whoever was on the email they're responding too (perhaps without thinking about who is or isn't included). I sent out -- and then repeatedly updated -- my spreadsheet database (via which I'm trying to track down contact-info on more classmates), but I can't tell if anyone is actually using it, although a few people have commented on particular points in it, indicating that they had looked it over.

Do you have any suggestion how to manage our discussions better? So far, despite repeated suggestions from several of us, only 8 people have joined the blog. Incidentally, Elsa, I noticed that there's a button (I think it's a T, for text I suppose) by which you can change the size of the text you're posting!

A Yahoo group (or something similar) was also suggested -- which can act like a blog but also send out the emails as often as one wants (i.e., individually, as a daily summary, or not at all -- can our blog do that?) -- but one that I'm a member of (for my high school class) only has a small membership too (about 15), despite a much larger pool who were notified about it.

Yet I keep asking people on my spreadsheet (i.e., those who haven't already opted off of "routine group emails") if they want to opt off, and very few have said that they do.

Occasionally someone seldom heard from will email, either to the group, or to me privately, and I'm surprised to realize that they've been reading. Someone I least expected (I forget who now, someone who left before I arrived in Santa Fe) said "thanks for organizing this virtual reunion", although I don't believe they've emailed to the group!

So what to do?

Rick

test - email post

testing email post

/Rick

And of course we were young.....

I think most us found our first year living away from home
stressful. We were all young, most in our teens (I was 17 when I
arrived in Santa Fe), and most of us were away from home for the
first time in our lives. I think most of us had experiences similar
to Rick's as we adjusted to our new lives as college freshmen. And
we each found new friends with similar interests and formed support
networks.

Since the stature of limitations has run out on this, I can admit now
that a few of us would gather two or three times a week for an
evening cocktail and to reflect on life at the College. It was great
for bonding and very supportive.

Would meditation classes have helped me adjust better during that
first year or two? Maybe. I was somewhat interested in Eastern
thought and practices then; but, would I have allowed myself to
participate enough to really get much out of it? Probably not: I
had other interests and desires more typical of teenage boys. It was
some decades before meditation found a place in my life.

Certainly the 60s were a tumultuous time that affected us in ways
we're probably still discovering, but I think young people have
always found the transition from childhood to adulthood to be
tumultuous and difficult. In some ways we were better off than many
other teens in the 60s in that we were living in a very protected,
almost cloistered, environment. And frankly, I think we LIVED in an
encounter group! At least for the first two years......

Cheers,

Carl Bostek
SF '68

rationality, spirituality, and emotions

From: Vida
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 22:50
my feelings about the reunion are deeply entangled with my feelings about Ken... As I recall, my Freshman year at St. John's included a few suicide attempts. There was something about the era, the isolation and other vulnerabilities involved.

Hi Vida and All,

What a pleasure to have something other than the reunion to talk about -- like suicide and death. (Sorry, just a joke -- on myself -- for calling it a pleasure.)

My first year (in Annapolis) was very hard -- my second year was worse. (Things got better when I got to Santa Fe, thanks.)

With a brief break in Alaska after St. John's (teaching school in a remote Indian village, a disastrous experience for which I was totally unprepared), I soon ended up in Berkeley, exploring pop-psychology and spirituality (officially in Unitarian theological school, partly to avoid the draft). That led to a year of serious work with autistic children at Napa State Mental Hospital (kids who had been virtually abandoned until a psychologist had gotten funding to start a program for them), then to a fairly serious zen practice for awhile, and identification as a Buddhist. Back in Alaska after 1975 I continued exploring various kinds of therapy and self-help groups, even taking all the courses in the graduate counseling and community psychology program at UAA, and working for a couple of years with street alcoholics for the Salvation Army. (Intermittently I also had a series of progressively more responsible bookkeeping jobs that eventually led to my being -- or at least calling myself -- a self-taught accountant, while manager of an international economic development consulting firm in D.C., which led to my studying economics, which is where I'm at now.)

But the point I want to make is that, at least for me, St. John's was very one-sided. It was what I wanted, don't get me wrong -- even though I wasn't very good at dealing with it. But I often thought later that concurrent meditation practice would have helped me. Or maybe some kind of concurrent encounter group. Maurie reminded me recently that she and some others were in a Christian prayer group, and I can imagine that that was very helpful for them.

That's not to say that, if mediation and/or encounter had been available, I would have participated, or been able to benefit. Possibly I had to find those things in my own time, in my own way. And in that, I'm sure that St. John's helped.

I'm convinced that we're living in a very difficult transitional period -- possibly getting worse before it gets better. Surely it will get better?

An historian I like (J.H. Plumb) referred to "the end of an epoch", by which he meant that the basic social institutions which have supported us since the beginning of the neolithic age (the beginning of agriculture) about 10,000 years ago, and the beginning of civilization (cities) about 5,000 years ago -- the family, state, religion, school, and cities themselves -- are breaking down under the stress of the scientific/technological/industrial revolution. Lots of other writers also identify a similar structural break occurring now.

So we had that too. And of course we were young.

But what I'm wondering about is whether the St. John's program (and St. John's students) would benefit from some form of "elective" (dare I say the word?) meditation, or group-encounter, or both?

Welcome Debbie!

Debbie Rodman (nee Lawther) and I have known each other since our days together in the the Unitarian LRY (Liberal Religious Youth, a misnomer if ever there was one except that we were young and we were liberal in more ways than our parents would condone!). I last saw Debbie in Kent back in '96 for the first time since I'd graduated and stayed in touch with her via e-mail for a few years. So I was thrilled to see that she'd surfaced again and is back in the States. By remarkable coincidence we're both in Kentucky right now so we'll have a chance to meet and catch up.

Once again, welcome back classmate!

Carl Bostek
SF '68

how about getting the Alumni Association to conduct the survey?

From: Allison Lemons Date: May 15, 2007 9:51:48 AM CDT
How about getting the Alumni Association to conduct the survey? ... You can put me on as a sponsor of the survey...


Thanks Allison, Carl, David, Don W., Ellin, Phil, and Tom for being willing to cosponsor the survey!

Are there any others who are willing to put your name "on the line"? (I believe you are, Gus, but I'll await your confirmation when you get a chance to read your email.) I’ll explain a bit more below why this might be important.

First I want to mention that Debbie Rodman Lawther – back in Kentucky after many years in the UK – has joined us (making 33 who have “checked in” about reunion-planning!) and is looking forward to a Homecoming/Class Reunion in Santa Fe in 2008. I’ve attached an updated spreadsheet including her email address and what is known about all others. I get so happy when a new person checks in, or even when I find contact info for someone for whom I didn’t have it before – please help!

I'm blind-copying those who would rather avoid lots of emails (so they'll be spared continuing discussion), but I’ll also post this message to the blog (http://sjcsfalums.blogspot.com/) so perhaps some of the discussion can shift there. (Whether there’s a way to attach a spreadsheet to the blog – and replace it periodically with updated versions – I don’t know. David, do you know? Or perhaps that wouldn’t be desirable, since it would make it public?)

Now about lobbying the Alumni Association board to conduct a survey of all Santa Fe alums about scheduling Homecoming:

I've been told that the College has problems with technology and with data -- so an online survey has two hurdles to jump right there. In addition, I'm told that the Alumni Relations Office -- which we might think of as the "secretariat" for the Alumni Association -- is under-funded and understaffed. And the association itself is a volunteer organization, paying expenses out of our annual dues. So there’s a natural tendency to avoid things having to do with technology, data, money, and time/effort. And – perhaps because of ignorance about the ease of online technology – there may be a fear that a survey of all Santa Fe alums would be quite expensive and time-consuming.

Then there’s the fact that they’ve already changed their Homecoming-scheduling policy – possibly for lots of complicated reasons beyond the announced one, that they believe it will make for more vibrant and rewarding Homecoming-experiences for us. When I tried to ask about those other possible reasons (since the reason given seemed a bit thin to me), I hit a stone wall of defensiveness (which is why we're now in the position of organizing a survey ourselves). But those other possible reasons are actually beside the point, I believe (unless the College simply doesn't want Homecomings in the summer regardless of how many -- or few -- can attend in the fall; in which case they should say so).

We’re pursuing a two-prong strategy:

We’re preparing as professional a survey as we can (more on that in a moment; you've seen the draft before).

And we’re lobbying the alumni board to get the association to sign-on as official sponsor of the survey, giving them some prior oversight of it’s contents before it goes out, and thus hopefully getting them more willing to act based on its results.

If they’re unwilling to cooperate, we might decide to send out the survey anyway, and/or to schedule and organize our own Reunion.

But I’m hopeful that we’ll get them to cooperate. In that respect, if there’s anyone you know on the association board (http://alumni.stjohnscollege.edu/?AlumniAssociation2), please discuss the matter with them, and let us know what you find out. We have a multi-pronged lobbying effort going on, the details of which I won’t go into now. But if you make sympathetic contact with someone on the board, we can get them in touch with others so they can strategize together.

Don Whitfield, who is in Chicago, has just given us the results of a survey done there (on local issues) by the Chicago chapter president, Rick Lightburn (SF’76), whom I plan to contact. He apparently does surveys professionally, and might be willing to look over our draft and suggest improvements.

I’d like as many people as possible to sign on as cosponsors of our survey – and I plan to ask the 34 people from later classes who responded to my little poll as well – because that will give added credibility, I believe, when we formally present what we propose to the Alumni Association. (If we're going to go ahead anyway with something quite professional and broadly-sponsored, and thus quite credible, wouldn't they be wise to sign on to get a little control?)

Beyond that, there are two (or perhaps three) big chores:

One is setting up the survey on www.SurveyMonkey.com or some other online site – and Carl has volunteered to work on that (and might welcome help?).

Then there is emailing an invitation to participate in the survey to all the Santa Fe alums, and I have volunteered (as long as I’m not in Alaska at the time -- so either before June 17, or after August 1) to go through the college’s online alumni site and extract all the email addresses of Santa Fe alums (I will welcome help, of course, as it will probably take a day or two of fulltime work).

And then – assuming that the online site tabulates the results automatically -- someone will have to interpret and report them. If the association signs on as official sponsor, I would think that someone on the board (Lightburn?) might want to do that (though we would certainly want access to the data too).

Anyway, it all seems doable to me. What do you think?

Regards,
Rick

Pink Adobe

The Pink Adobe has been sold. Part of the Albuquerque Journal's May 9, 2007, story follows.
Wednesday, May 9, 2007

Longtime Owners Sell Pink Adobe

By Kiera Hay
Journal Staff Writer
After 63 years, the Pink Adobe has passed from the hands of the Murphy-Hoback family.
Long a favorite for its tasty food and cozy ambiance, the Pink was purchased Tuesday by David and Christie Garrett, founders of Burlington, Vt.-based the Garrett Hotel Group, whose holdings include the Inn of the Five Graces, just down the street from the Pink Adobe.
Priscilla Hoback, whose mother Rosalea Murphy founded the restaurant, said the decision to sell was "agonizing."
"It was a very long, thought-out, carefully weighed decision. It's been in my family since 1944," she said.
Negotiations for the Old Santa Fe Trail property have been ongoing for about a year, she said. Ultimately, selling the restaurant to David Garrett was a logical choice, it seems.
The Garrett Hotel Group leased the buildings that house the Inn of the Five Graces five years ago. According to a press release issued Tuesday, "The Inn of the Five Graces lacked one major component to transform it into a world-class hotel like the others in the (Garrett) group— a great restaurant."
Since its inception in 1944, the Pink has grown to include the popular Dragon Room bar and Café Pink.
Murphy passed away in 2000, leaving ownership to Hoback and her son, Joseph Hoback, Priscilla Hoback said. Joseph's wife, Jennifer Wilson Hoback, who also ran the restaurant, will join the Garrett Hotel Group.

Whatever became of Frank Hoback?

What We Do Now and How We Got Here From There, 40+ Years Ago

Having scared myself to death by seeing the size of this type face, I'm not sure I can go on. Nonetheless, Tom, I wanted to respond to your nice invitation to tell you about my job conducting freight trains in the NYC area, mostly at Port Newark. Whew; this makes me nervous as a cat! Give me large noisy moving equipment any day over having to look at my own typing in huge letters. Would welcome advice on how to shrink this stuff to a size less similar to gravestone lettering.

Pensieve

A repository for memories we wish to share from those years at the College. Just add your story, anecdote or memory as a comment to this post.

Santa Fe 1968 Gallery

These photos were all provided by Tom Keens.
(Click on any photo to see it full size.)

A Story about Ken Kronberg

I wanted to share a vivid memory I have of Ken.

This took place when he was at the Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions in Santa Barbara, along with Phil Chandler. My mother lived in Santa Barbara at the time and I returned home for a visit from where I was teaching in Vermont. Ken and I went out to Isla Vista, the UCSB campus, to see "2001: A Space Odyssey." Ken had never seen it. (For this story, I'm assuming you have seen the film.)

At my insistence we sat down close in one of the very front rows. About half way through the first part, the part where it's all apes and bones, Ken leaned over and out of the side of his mouth said, "How long does it go on like this?" I realized that he had correctly grasped the pace and indirectness of the movie, so rather than say, "Oh, we'll get to outer space soon enough," I said, "The whole movie is like this."

There was a long silence next to me while the movie continued. After that, from time to time, always out of the side of his mouth, Ken muttered, "I'll get you for this. I don't know how but I'll get you." In the moment, I didn't feel threatened or even offended. I realized that he was not having a wonderful time but also that he was having sort of a good time complaining about it to me.

After the film ended and we were walking out I speculated on what the monolith in the movie, which shows up in each of the four segments, might represent. Ken thought about it and we bounced it back and forth a couple of times and then he was off and running! To my amazement and everlasting impression he went over the entire movie from beginning to end. He saw in each of the distinct parts a different directorial style, concluded that Kubrick had mimicked and then bested the other directors in how he constructed each part (I regret I can not recall a single one of those directors). His thoughts were original, intense and quite unexpected. Before the evening ended Ken declared, "I think I've just seen the greatest movie ever made."

This memory has stuck with me all this time because it embodied much of what Ken meant to me as a friend. He was intense, funny, ironic, insightful, passionate, bright and articulate and never afraid to follow his logic to see where it led. I valued that then and I value it now. That there are implicit risks in being that kind of person, we all know. It may be that his capacity to construct ornate explanations of complex phenomena led him astray. I don't know.

I am very sad that Ken is gone.

How to post to this blog

Hello, everyone and thanks for giving this a try.

As you can see, it is easy to follow up a posting with a comment. A posting is a new topic with a title of its own. Comments are responses to the initial post or to other comments (though the content of comments is unrestricted).

I'm new to this blog site myself but it appears you need to log into a Google/gmail account (easy and free to obtain) in order to add a comment or to post a new topic. To post a new topic, if you wish, I think the following steps work.

1. Go to the blog site: http://sjcsfalums.blogspot.com/
2. Click on "sign in" and give your gmail account name and password.
3. I'm not sure what the next page shows because I'm listed at the blog owner but I think you should see a link back to the blog site. Otherwise, just re-enter the blog URL again.
4. Now you should see a link at the top of the page called "New Post"
5. Clicking on that link starts your new posting.
   

Welcome!

This blog was created to support a continuing conversation begun in email among graduates of Saint Johns College in Santa Fe, NM. The blog is open to all viewers, registration (free) is required to add comments. To become an author please email tolstoy@gmail.com (aka David Mischel). If you have any problem, suggestion or comment on this blog, please email me and I will do whatever I can.

Rules of behavior are minimally established in the blogspot.com rules. In general, flame wars and personal attacks are discouraged. I think we can all share an expectation that "seminar rules of behavior" apply and leave it at that.

Welcome!

< david